On Sun, 18 May 2025 21:15:21 GMT, Chen Liang <li...@openjdk.org> wrote:
> > Did you consider calling getComponentType(), which already returns the > > field? > > I don't think we want an extra indirection here - The logic here is quite > simple. Counterargument could be that `MethodType::descriptorString` calls > `toMethodDescriptorString`, except these methods involve more complex caching > and is not simple like this field access. My mental model anyway is that this trivial inline would be something the VM would do readily. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/25280#discussion_r2096089013