core-libs-dev  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: RFR: 8356218: [macos] Document --app-content [v2] Alexander Matveev
  • Re: RFR: 8356218: [macos] Document --app-content [v3] Alexander Matveev
  • Re: RFR: 8356218: [macos] Document --app-content [v3] Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8356218: [macos] Document --app-content [v3] Alexander Matveev
  • Re: RFR: 8356218: [macos] Document --app-content [v3] Alexander Matveev
  • Re: RFR: 8356218: [macos] Document --app-content [v4] Alexander Matveev
  • Re: RFR: 8356218: [macos] Document --app-content [v4] Alexey Semenyuk
  • Integrated: 8356218: [macos] Document --app-content Alexander Matveev
• Re: RFR: 8355652: Parse ClassFileFormatVersion from ClassFileVersion [v2] Chen Liang
• Re: RFR: 8355652: Parse ClassFileFormatVersion from ClassFileVersion simon
• RFR: 8365703: Refactor ZipCoder to use common JLA.uncheckedNewStringNoRepl Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8365703: Refactor ZipCoder to use common JLA.uncheckedNewStringNoRepl Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8365703: Refactor ZipCoder to use common JLA.uncheckedNewStringNoRepl Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8365703: Refactor ZipCoder to use common JLA.uncheckedNewStringNoRepl Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8365703: Refactor ZipCoder to use common JLA.uncheckedNewStringNoRepl Lance Andersen
  • Re: RFR: 8365703: Refactor ZipCoder to use common JLA.uncheckedNewStringNoRepl Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8365703: Refactor ZipCoder to use common JLA.uncheckedNewStringNoRepl [v2] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8365703: Refactor ZipCoder to use common JLA.uncheckedNewStringNoRepl [v2] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8365703: Refactor ZipCoder to use common JLA.uncheckedNewStringNoRepl [v2] Lance Andersen
  • Re: RFR: 8365703: Refactor ZipCoder to use common JLA.uncheckedNewStringNoRepl [v3] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8365703: Refactor ZipCoder to use common JLA.uncheckedNewStringNoRepl [v3] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8365703: Refactor ZipCoder to use common JLA.uncheckedNewStringNoRepl [v4] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8365703: Refactor ZipCoder to use common JLA.uncheckedNewStringNoRepl [v4] Lance Andersen
  • Re: RFR: 8365703: Refactor ZipCoder to use common JLA.uncheckedNewStringNoRepl [v4] Roger Riggs
  • Integrated: 8365703: Refactor ZipCoder to use common JLA.uncheckedNewStringNoRepl Roger Riggs
• Re: RFR: 8360025: (se) Convert kqueue Selector Implementation to use FFM APIs [v2] Darragh Clarke
  • Re: RFR: 8360025: (se) Convert kqueue Selector Implementation to use FFM APIs [v2] Darragh Clarke
  • Re: RFR: 8360025: (se) Convert kqueue Selector Implementation to use FFM APIs [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8360025: (se) Convert kqueue Selector Implementation to use FFM APIs [v2] ExE Boss
• Re: RFR: 8349910: Implement JEP 517: HTTP/3 for the HTTP Client API [v9] Daniel Jeliński
  • Re: RFR: 8349910: Implement JEP 517: HTTP/3 for the HTTP Client API [v9] Daniel Jeliński
  • Re: RFR: 8349910: Implement JEP 517: HTTP/3 for the HTTP Client API [v9] Daniel Jeliński
  • Re: RFR: 8349910: Implement JEP 517: HTTP/3 for the HTTP Client API [v9] Daniel Jeliński
  • Re: RFR: 8349910: Implement JEP 517: HTTP/3 for the HTTP Client API [v9] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8349910: Implement JEP 517: HTTP/3 for the HTTP Client API [v9] Daniel Fuchs
• Re: RFR: 8349910: Implement JEP 517: HTTP/3 for the HTTP Client API [v11] Daniel Jeliński
  • Re: RFR: 8349910: Implement JEP 517: HTTP/3 for the HTTP Client API [v11] Daniel Jeliński
  • Re: RFR: 8349910: Implement JEP 517: HTTP/3 for the HTTP Client API [v11] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8349910: Implement JEP 517: HTTP/3 for the HTTP Client API [v11] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8349910: Implement JEP 517: HTTP/3 for the HTTP Client API [v11] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8349910: Implement JEP 517: HTTP/3 for the HTTP Client API [v11] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8349910: Implement JEP 517: HTTP/3 for the HTTP Client API [v11] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8349910: Implement JEP 517: HTTP/3 for the HTTP Client API [v11] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8349910: Implement JEP 517: HTTP/3 for the HTTP Client API [v11] Daniel Fuchs
• RFR: 8365700: jar --validate without any --file option leaves around a temporary file /tmp/tmpJar<number>.jar Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8365700: jar --validate without any --file option leaves around a temporary file /tmp/tmpJar<number>.jar Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8365700: Jar --validate without any --file option leaves around a temporary file /tmp/tmpJar<number>.jar Andreas Steiner
  • Re: RFR: 8365700: Jar --validate without any --file option leaves around a temporary file /tmp/tmpJar<number>.jar Matthias Baesken
  • Integrated: 8365700: Jar --validate without any --file option leaves around a temporary file /tmp/tmpJar<number>.jar Matthias Baesken
• Integrated: 8361842: Move input validation checks to Java for java.lang.StringCoding intrinsics Volkan Yazici
• RFR: 8365719: Refactor uses of JLA.uncheckedNewStringNoRepl Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8365719: Refactor uses of JLA.uncheckedNewStringNoRepl Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8365719: Refactor uses of JLA.uncheckedNewStringNoRepl Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8365719: Refactor uses of JLA.uncheckedNewStringNoRepl Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8365719: Refactor uses of JLA.uncheckedNewStringNoRepl Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8365719: Refactor uses of JLA.uncheckedNewStringNoRepl Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8365719: Refactor uses of JLA.uncheckedNewStringNoRepl Johannes Döbler
  • Re: RFR: 8365719: Refactor uses of JLA.uncheckedNewStringNoRepl Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8365719: Refactor uses of JLA.uncheckedNewStringNoRepl Johannes Döbler
  • Integrated: 8365719: Refactor uses of JLA.uncheckedNewStringNoRepl Roger Riggs
• Integrated: 8362448: Make use of the Double.toString(double) algorithm in java.text.DecimalFormat Raffaello Giulietti
• Re: RFR: 8362448: Make use of the Double.toString(double) algorithm in java.text.DecimalFormat [v8] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8362448: Make use of the Double.toString(double) algorithm in java.text.DecimalFormat [v8] Naoto Sato
• Re: RFR: 8362448: Make use of the Double.toString(double) algorithm in java.text.DecimalFormat [v2] Raffaello Giulietti
• RFR: 8365398: TEST_BUG: java/rmi/transport/checkLeaseInfoLeak/CheckLeaseLeak.java failing intermittently Johny Jose
  • Re: RFR: 8365398: TEST_BUG: java/rmi/transport/checkLeaseInfoLeak/CheckLeaseLeak.java failing intermittently SendaoYan
  • Re: RFR: 8365398: TEST_BUG: java/rmi/transport/checkLeaseInfoLeak/CheckLeaseLeak.java failing intermittently SendaoYan
  • Re: RFR: 8365398: TEST_BUG: java/rmi/transport/checkLeaseInfoLeak/CheckLeaseLeak.java failing intermittently Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8365398: TEST_BUG: java/rmi/transport/checkLeaseInfoLeak/CheckLeaseLeak.java failing intermittently [v3] Johny Jose
  • Re: RFR: 8365398: TEST_BUG: java/rmi/transport/checkLeaseInfoLeak/CheckLeaseLeak.java failing intermittently [v3] Johny Jose
  • Re: RFR: 8365398: TEST_BUG: java/rmi/transport/checkLeaseInfoLeak/CheckLeaseLeak.java failing intermittently [v3] Johny Jose
  • Re: RFR: 8365398: TEST_BUG: java/rmi/transport/checkLeaseInfoLeak/CheckLeaseLeak.java failing intermittently [v3] Mark Sheppard
  • Re: RFR: 8365398: TEST_BUG: java/rmi/transport/checkLeaseInfoLeak/CheckLeaseLeak.java failing intermittently [v2] Johny Jose
  • Re: RFR: 8365398: TEST_BUG: java/rmi/transport/checkLeaseInfoLeak/CheckLeaseLeak.java failing intermittently [v2] Mark Sheppard
  • Re: RFR: 8365398: TEST_BUG: java/rmi/transport/checkLeaseInfoLeak/CheckLeaseLeak.java failing intermittently [v2] Johny Jose
• jpackage, wix and custom action Davide Perini
  • Re: jpackage, wix and custom action Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: jpackage, wix and custom action Davide Perini
  • Re: [External] : Re: jpackage, wix and custom action Alexey Semenyuk
• Re: RFR: 8077587: BigInteger Roots [v73] fabioromano1
• RFR: 8365620: Using enhanced switch in MethodHandleDesc Shaojin Wen
  • Re: RFR: 8365620: Using enhanced switch in MethodHandleDesc Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8365620: Using enhanced switch in MethodHandleDesc Shaojin Wen
  • Re: RFR: 8365620: Using enhanced switch in MethodHandleDesc ExE Boss
  • Re: RFR: 8365620: Using enhanced switch in MethodHandleDesc Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8365620: Using enhanced switch in MethodHandleDesc David Alayachew
  • Re: RFR: 8365620: Using enhanced switch in MethodHandleDesc Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8365620: Using enhanced switch in MethodHandleDesc David Alayachew
  • Integrated: 8365620: Using enhanced switch in MethodHandleDesc Shaojin Wen
• RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v4] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v2] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v2] ExE Boss
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v2] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v3] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v4] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v4] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v4] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v4] John R Rose
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v4] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v4] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v5] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v5] ExE Boss
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v5] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v5] ExE Boss
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v5] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v5] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v6] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v7] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v8] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v8] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v8] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v9] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v9] Jason Mehrens
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v9] ExE Boss
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v9] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v10] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v10] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v10] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v10] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v10] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v11] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v12] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v12] Albert Mingkun Yang
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v12] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v12] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v12] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v12] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v12] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v14] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v14] ExE Boss
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v13] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v13] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v13] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v13] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v13] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v13] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v13] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v13] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v15] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v15] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v15] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v15] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v16] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v16] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v16] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v16] duke
  • Integrated: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early Guanqiang Han
• Re: RFR: 8361842: Move input validation checks to Java for java.lang.StringCoding intrinsics [v16] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8361842: Move input validation checks to Java for java.lang.StringCoding intrinsics [v16] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8361842: Move input validation checks to Java for java.lang.StringCoding intrinsics [v16] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8361842: Move input validation checks to Java for java.lang.StringCoding intrinsics [v16] Roger Riggs
• Integrated: 8361638: java.lang.classfile.CodeBuilder.CatchBuilder should not throw IllegalArgumentException for representable exception handlers Chen Liang
• Using enhanced switch in MethodHandleDesc wenshao
  • Re: Using enhanced switch in MethodHandleDesc Chen Liang
• RFR: 8350550: Preload classes from AOT cache during VM bootstrap Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8350550: Preload classes from AOT cache during VM bootstrap Dan Heidinga
  • Re: RFR: 8350550: Preload classes from AOT cache during VM bootstrap Dan Heidinga
  • Re: RFR: 8350550: Preload classes from AOT cache during VM bootstrap Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8350550: Preload classes from AOT cache during VM bootstrap [v2] Dan Heidinga
  • Re: RFR: 8350550: Preload classes from AOT cache during VM bootstrap [v3] Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8350550: Preload classes from AOT cache during VM bootstrap Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8350550: Preload classes from AOT cache during VM bootstrap [v2] Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8350550: Preload classes from AOT cache during VM bootstrap [v2] Dan Heidinga
  • Re: RFR: 8350550: Preload classes from AOT cache during VM bootstrap [v5] Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8350550: Preload classes from AOT cache during VM bootstrap [v2] Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8350550: Preload classes from AOT cache during VM bootstrap [v3] Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8350550: Preload classes from AOT cache during VM bootstrap [v3] Dan Heidinga
  • Re: RFR: 8350550: Preload classes from AOT cache during VM bootstrap [v3] Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8350550: Preload classes from AOT cache during VM bootstrap [v3] Dan Heidinga
  • Re: RFR: 8350550: Preload classes from AOT cache during VM bootstrap [v3] Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8350550: Preload classes from AOT cache during VM bootstrap [v3] Dan Heidinga
  • Re: RFR: 8350550: Preload classes from AOT cache during VM bootstrap [v4] Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8350550: Preload classes from AOT cache during VM bootstrap [v5] Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8350550: Preload classes from AOT cache during VM bootstrap [v5] Dan Heidinga
  • Re: RFR: 8350550: Preload classes from AOT cache during VM bootstrap [v5] Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8350550: Preload classes from AOT cache during VM bootstrap [v6] Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8350550: Preload classes from AOT cache during VM bootstrap [v6] Ashutosh Mehra
  • Re: RFR: 8350550: Preload classes from AOT cache during VM bootstrap [v6] Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8350550: Preload classes from AOT cache during VM bootstrap [v6] Ashutosh Mehra
  • Re: RFR: 8350550: Preload classes from AOT cache during VM bootstrap [v6] Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8350550: Preload classes from AOT cache during VM bootstrap [v7] Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8350550: Preload classes from AOT cache during VM bootstrap [v7] Ashutosh Mehra
  • Re: RFR: 8350550: Preload classes from AOT cache during VM bootstrap [v7] Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8350550: Preload classes from AOT cache during VM bootstrap [v7] Ashutosh Mehra
  • Re: RFR: 8350550: Preload classes from AOT cache during VM bootstrap [v7] Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8350550: Preload classes from AOT cache during VM bootstrap [v9] Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8350550: Preload classes from AOT cache during VM bootstrap [v9] Ashutosh Mehra
  • Re: RFR: 8350550: Preload classes from AOT cache during VM bootstrap [v9] Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8350550: Preload classes from AOT cache during VM bootstrap [v10] Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8350550: Preload classes from AOT cache during VM bootstrap [v10] Ashutosh Mehra
  • Re: RFR: 8350550: Preload classes from AOT cache during VM bootstrap [v10] Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8350550: Preload classes from AOT cache during VM bootstrap [v10] Vladimir Kozlov
  • Re: RFR: 8350550: Preload classes from AOT cache during VM bootstrap [v10] Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8350550: Preload classes from AOT cache during VM bootstrap [v8] Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8350550: Preload classes from AOT cache during VM bootstrap [v8] Ioi Lam

• Earlier messages
• Later messages