On Sat, 17 May 2025 01:27:38 GMT, Henry Jen <henry...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> This PR check the jar file to ensure entries are consistent from the central >> directory and local file header. Also check there is no duplicate entry >> names that could override the desired content by accident. > > Henry Jen has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional > commit since the last revision: > > Address review feedback src/jdk.jartool/share/man/jar.md line 235: > 233: > 234: The jar tool will return a status code of 0 if there were no integrity > issues encountered and a > 235: status code of 1 an issue was found. When an integrity issue is > reported, it will often require I am wondering if we should not explicitly said status code of 1 to be more flexible. s/status code of 1/non-zero status code ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24430#discussion_r2098459726
