On Wed, 30 Jul 2025 10:57:33 GMT, Coleen Phillimore <cole...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> I mean the existing private fields of `SharedSecrets`[^1] so that the JIT is >> able to constant fold calls to `SharedSecrets::getJava*Access()` so that it >> becomes equally as performant as using a `Holder` class. >> >> Modifiers are transient, as those are sourced from the `InnerClasses` >> attribute, which can be changed when classes are redefined by a **JVMTI** >> agent, but access flags can’t be changed through redefinition. >> >> [^1]: >> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/blob/330ee871315348594171c43aa75b58f6027001af/src/java.base/share/classes/jdk/internal/access/SharedSecrets.java#L62-L92 > > I don't think inner class attributes can be changed via JVMTI RedefineClasses > either. I'm pretty sure we check and that's considered a change of schema. > File an RFE to make SharedSecrets fields @Stable though for a different > change. I don’t have a **JBS** account, and I don’t like going through <https://bugreport.java.com>, so could someone else file said **RFE**? ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26517#discussion_r2248196045
