On Thu, 7 Aug 2025 22:30:50 GMT, Naoto Sato <na...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> Justin Lu has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional >> commit since the last revision: >> >> reflect comments > > Thanks for cleaning this. This is definitely a leftover from > [JDK-8186697](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8186697). I think "cu" > needs to have the same wording? > @naotoj You are right regarding "cu"; updated the PR as such. I am wondering > if NumberFormat should also mention "cu" as well then under its own Unicode > Extensions section, (which I can include in this change). I think so. NumberFormat can also be affected by "cu" extension. > Let me know if the new wording changes make sense to you, or if you have a > different way of implying that "nu" and "cu" both have priority over "rg" for > their respective values. The wording is fine to me. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26683#issuecomment-3166111072
