On Fri, 15 Aug 2025 07:07:57 GMT, Guanqiang Han <g...@openjdk.org> wrote:

>> This issue is related to the definition of __sigset_t (__sigset_t  
>> act.sa_mask).   In the glibc source, __sigset_t is defined in multiple 
>> places:  
>> - bits/types/__sigset_t.h 
>> <img width="1071" height="415" alt="image02" 
>> src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/4dff7546-f0b3-448c-832f-54f7b9ffc476";
>>  />
>> 
>> 
>> - sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/bits/types/__sigset_t.h (introduced after glibc 
>> 2.25)   
>> <img width="1059" height="487" alt="image01" 
>> src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/54101f9b-3b1a-4943-83ee-6f6471c060a6";
>>  />
>> 
>> 
>> During compilation with Clang, the latter definition appears to be used, 
>> where __sigset_t is a struct, causing the printf("%X", act.sa_mask) to fail.
>> 
>> we can detect whether _SIGSET_NWORDS is defined and handle the printing 
>> differently based on that, ensuring correct handling of the struct type.
>
> Guanqiang Han has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional 
> commit since the last revision:
> 
>   Update exePrintSignalDisposition.c
>   
>   Remove unnecessary sa_mask printing based on reviewer feedback

Marked as reviewed by ayang (Reviewer).

-------------

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/26771#pullrequestreview-3123152952

Reply via email to