On Wed, 10 Sep 2025 07:53:15 GMT, Thomas Schatzl <tscha...@openjdk.org> wrote:
>> We would like to finally wrap up this PR as we are about to Propose To >> Target [JEP 522](openjdk.org/jeps/522) to JDK 26, so it would be nice to get >> re-reviews from the reviewers that already signed it off if you think it is >> useful. >> >> Nothing much changed actually for months now, particularly in the area of >> target-specific support, but maybe one more rerun on the more exotic >> platforms (AIX/PPC, RISC-V) just in case would be fine. >> >> Internally it went through Oracle's tier1-8 without any issue again (that is >> revision >> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/23739/commits/b3873d66cd43518d5dc71e060fc52a13372dbfa5, >> but the changes since then were very cosmetic). > >> Hi @tschatzl : I witnessed some conflicts when applying this on latest jdk >> head. Maybe you can do another merge and rebase? I can help rerun the tests >> on RISC-V. (Note that there is one failing test: >> `test/hotspot/jtreg/gtest/GTestWrapper.java` if I use the same base as in >> your repo, and that issue has been resolved by >> [JDK-8366897](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8366897)) > > Merged. Thanks for another round of testing (also to @TheRealMDoerr). > Hi @tschatzl, I see one build failure on s390x, > > ``` > # > # A fatal error has been detected by the Java Runtime Environment: > # > # SIGILL (0x4) at pc=0x000003ffaad14a42, pid=1801882, tid=1801914 > # > # JRE version: OpenJDK Runtime Environment (26.0) (fastdebug build > 26-internal-adhoc.amit.jdk) > # Java VM: OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM (fastdebug 26-internal-adhoc.amit.jdk, > mixed mode, tiered, compressed oops, compressed class ptrs, g1 gc, > linux-s390x) > # Problematic frame: > # V [libjvm.so+0x414a46] BarrierSetNMethod::set_guard_value(nmethod*, int, > int)+0xfe > # > # Core dump will be written. Default location: Core dumps may be processed > with "/usr/share/apport/apport -p%p -s%s -c%c -d%d -P%P -u%u -g%g -F%F -- %E" > (or dumping to /home/amit/jdk/make/core.1801882) > ``` > > I am working on this on priority, but just in case you want to merge it, I > will open another issue and push the fix. Seems like build failure came from one change merged yesterday- https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/26399, I am working on it and created https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8367325 ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23739#issuecomment-3274462944
