On Sat, 20 Sep 2025 19:29:11 GMT, Tagir F. Valeev <[email protected]> wrote:
> Please review this small change. If you have more ideas which classes may > miss specializations of SequencedCollection methods, I can add them to this > PR as well. It's a very sensible change; thanks! The only small, orthogonal quibble inline. test/jdk/java/util/Collections/EmptyListTest.java line 24: > 22: */ > 23: > 24: /** A jtreg comment styled as a javadoc comment is one of my pet peeves. IDE and javac (since JDK 23) treats it as a javadoc comment. For example, such a comment has unknown javadoc tags, or may be considered dangling (which is what happens in your case). ------------- PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/27406#pullrequestreview-3249224741 PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/27406#discussion_r2365789233
