Hello! It is nice to have a more easy to understand name for LazyConstant. However, I would like it to be simplified further to "Lazy" instead of "LazyConstant". The name `LazyConstant` is just too long and it will pollute method signatures and field declarations. While there might be other implementations of a lazy value concept, this is a good and sensible one and it is what people usually expect from a lazy value. This is a valid design choice for a lazy value like being a mutable is a design choice for list type. If people want other lazy semantics, they could use another package for their package name.
"LazyConstant" is possibly more explicit, but "Lazy" is much better from the aesthetic point of view. And in both cases people have to learn a new name and associate semantics with it. Please allow code to be more beautiful. Best Regards, Konstantin Plotnikov
