core-libs-dev  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: RFR: 8361972: Clarify the condition of System.console() about standard input/output [v4] Stuart Marks
  • Re: RFR: 8361972: Clarify the condition of System.console() about standard input/output [v4] Naoto Sato
• RFR: 8365885: Clean up constant pool reflection native code Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8365885: Clean up constant pool reflection native code Ioi Lam
  • Re: RFR: 8365885: Clean up constant pool reflection native code Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8365885: Clean up constant pool reflection native code David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8365885: Clean up constant pool reflection native code Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8365885: Clean up constant pool reflection native code Chen Liang
  • Integrated: 8365885: Clean up constant pool reflection native code Chen Liang
• RFR: 8365671: Typo in Joiner.allUntil example Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8365671: Typo in Joiner.allUntil example Chen Liang
  • Integrated: 8365671: Typo in Joiner.allUntil example Alan Bateman
• Re: RFR: 8349910: Implement JEP 517: HTTP/3 for the HTTP Client API [v13] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8349910: Implement JEP 517: HTTP/3 for the HTTP Client API [v13] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8349910: Implement JEP 517: HTTP/3 for the HTTP Client API [v13] Daniel Jeliński
  • Re: RFR: 8349910: Implement JEP 517: HTTP/3 for the HTTP Client API [v13] Artur Barashev
  • Re: RFR: 8349910: Implement JEP 517: HTTP/3 for the HTTP Client API [v13] Artur Barashev
  • Re: RFR: 8349910: Implement JEP 517: HTTP/3 for the HTTP Client API [v13] Artur Barashev
  • Re: RFR: 8349910: Implement JEP 517: HTTP/3 for the HTTP Client API [v13] Artur Barashev
  • Re: RFR: 8349910: Implement JEP 517: HTTP/3 for the HTTP Client API [v13] Artur Barashev
  • Re: RFR: 8349910: Implement JEP 517: HTTP/3 for the HTTP Client API [v13] Artur Barashev
  • Re: RFR: 8349910: Implement JEP 517: HTTP/3 for the HTTP Client API [v13] Daniel Fuchs
  • Re: RFR: 8349910: Implement JEP 517: HTTP/3 for the HTTP Client API [v13] Artur Barashev
  • Re: RFR: 8349910: Implement JEP 517: HTTP/3 for the HTTP Client API [v13] Daniel Jeliński
• RFR: 8365832: Refactor FloatingDecimal Shaojin Wen
  • Re: RFR: 8365832: Refactor FloatingDecimal Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8365832: Refactor FloatingDecimal Shaojin Wen
  • Re: RFR: 8365832: Refactor FloatingDecimal Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8365832: Refactor FloatingDecimal Johannes Graham
  • Re: RFR: 8365832: Refactor FloatingDecimal Thomas Zimmermann
  • Re: RFR: 8365832: Refactor FloatingDecimal [v2] Shaojin Wen
  • Re: RFR: 8365832: Refactor FloatingDecimal Johannes Graham
  • Re: RFR: 8365832: Refactor FloatingDecimal Shaojin Wen
  • Re: RFR: 8365832: Refactor FloatingDecimal Shaojin Wen
  • Re: RFR: 8365832: Refactor FloatingDecimal Shaojin Wen
  • Re: RFR: 8365832: Refactor FloatingDecimal Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8365832: Optimize FloatingDecimal and DigitList with byte[] and cleanup Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8365832: Optimize FloatingDecimal and DigitList with byte[] and cleanup Shaojin Wen
  • Re: RFR: 8365832: Optimize FloatingDecimal and DigitList with byte[] and cleanup Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8365832: Refactor FloatingDecimal Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8365832: Refactor FloatingDecimal Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8365832: Optimize FloatingDecimal and DigitList with byte[] and cleanup [v3] Shaojin Wen
  • Re: RFR: 8365832: Optimize FloatingDecimal and DigitList with byte[] and cleanup [v4] Shaojin Wen
  • Re: RFR: 8365832: Optimize FloatingDecimal and DigitList with byte[] and cleanup [v4] Johannes Graham
  • Re: RFR: 8365832: Optimize FloatingDecimal and DigitList with byte[] and cleanup [v4] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8365832: Optimize FloatingDecimal and DigitList with byte[] and cleanup [v4] Johannes Graham
  • Re: RFR: 8365832: Optimize FloatingDecimal and DigitList with byte[] and cleanup [v5] Shaojin Wen
  • Re: RFR: 8365832: Optimize FloatingDecimal and DigitList with byte[] and cleanup [v6] Shaojin Wen
  • Re: RFR: 8365832: Optimize FloatingDecimal and DigitList with byte[] and cleanup [v6] Thomas Zimmermann
  • Re: RFR: 8365832: Optimize FloatingDecimal and DigitList with byte[] and cleanup [v6] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8365832: Optimize FloatingDecimal and DigitList with byte[] and cleanup [v6] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8365832: Optimize FloatingDecimal and DigitList with byte[] and cleanup [v6] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8365832: Optimize FloatingDecimal and DigitList with byte[] and cleanup [v7] Shaojin Wen
  • Re: RFR: 8365832: Optimize FloatingDecimal and DigitList with byte[] and cleanup [v7] Raffaello Giulietti
  • Re: RFR: 8365832: Optimize FloatingDecimal and DigitList with byte[] and cleanup [v7] Chen Liang
  • Integrated: 8365832: Optimize FloatingDecimal and DigitList with byte[] and cleanup Shaojin Wen
• RFR: 8356218: [macos] Document --app-content Alexander Matveev
  • Re: RFR: 8356218: [macos] Document --app-content Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8356218: [macos] Document --app-content [v2] Alexander Matveev
  • Re: RFR: 8356218: [macos] Document --app-content [v2] Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8356218: [macos] Document --app-content [v3] Alexander Matveev
  • Re: RFR: 8356218: [macos] Document --app-content Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8356218: [macos] Document --app-content Alexander Matveev
  • Re: RFR: 8356218: [macos] Document --app-content [v2] Alexander Matveev
  • Re: RFR: 8356218: [macos] Document --app-content [v2] Alexander Matveev
  • Re: RFR: 8356218: [macos] Document --app-content [v2] Francesco Andreuzzi
  • Re: RFR: 8356218: [macos] Document --app-content [v2] Alexander Matveev
  • Re: RFR: 8356218: [macos] Document --app-content [v2] Alexander Matveev
  • Re: RFR: 8356218: [macos] Document --app-content [v3] Alexander Matveev
  • Re: RFR: 8356218: [macos] Document --app-content [v3] Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: RFR: 8356218: [macos] Document --app-content [v3] Alexander Matveev
  • Re: RFR: 8356218: [macos] Document --app-content [v3] Alexander Matveev
  • Re: RFR: 8356218: [macos] Document --app-content [v4] Alexander Matveev
  • Re: RFR: 8356218: [macos] Document --app-content [v4] Alexey Semenyuk
  • Integrated: 8356218: [macos] Document --app-content Alexander Matveev
• RFR: 8365703: Refactor ZipCoder to use common JLA.uncheckedNewStringNoRepl Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8365703: Refactor ZipCoder to use common JLA.uncheckedNewStringNoRepl Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8365703: Refactor ZipCoder to use common JLA.uncheckedNewStringNoRepl Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8365703: Refactor ZipCoder to use common JLA.uncheckedNewStringNoRepl Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8365703: Refactor ZipCoder to use common JLA.uncheckedNewStringNoRepl Lance Andersen
  • Re: RFR: 8365703: Refactor ZipCoder to use common JLA.uncheckedNewStringNoRepl Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8365703: Refactor ZipCoder to use common JLA.uncheckedNewStringNoRepl [v2] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8365703: Refactor ZipCoder to use common JLA.uncheckedNewStringNoRepl [v2] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8365703: Refactor ZipCoder to use common JLA.uncheckedNewStringNoRepl [v2] Lance Andersen
  • Re: RFR: 8365703: Refactor ZipCoder to use common JLA.uncheckedNewStringNoRepl [v3] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8365703: Refactor ZipCoder to use common JLA.uncheckedNewStringNoRepl [v3] Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8365703: Refactor ZipCoder to use common JLA.uncheckedNewStringNoRepl [v4] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8365703: Refactor ZipCoder to use common JLA.uncheckedNewStringNoRepl [v4] Lance Andersen
  • Re: RFR: 8365703: Refactor ZipCoder to use common JLA.uncheckedNewStringNoRepl [v4] Roger Riggs
  • Integrated: 8365703: Refactor ZipCoder to use common JLA.uncheckedNewStringNoRepl Roger Riggs
• Re: RFR: 8360025: (se) Convert kqueue Selector Implementation to use FFM APIs [v2] Darragh Clarke
  • Re: RFR: 8360025: (se) Convert kqueue Selector Implementation to use FFM APIs [v2] Darragh Clarke
  • Re: RFR: 8360025: (se) Convert kqueue Selector Implementation to use FFM APIs [v2] Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8360025: (se) Convert kqueue Selector Implementation to use FFM APIs [v2] ExE Boss
• Re: RFR: 8349910: Implement JEP 517: HTTP/3 for the HTTP Client API [v9] Daniel Jeliński
  • Re: RFR: 8349910: Implement JEP 517: HTTP/3 for the HTTP Client API [v9] Daniel Jeliński
  • Re: RFR: 8349910: Implement JEP 517: HTTP/3 for the HTTP Client API [v9] Daniel Jeliński
  • Re: RFR: 8349910: Implement JEP 517: HTTP/3 for the HTTP Client API [v9] Daniel Jeliński
  • Re: RFR: 8349910: Implement JEP 517: HTTP/3 for the HTTP Client API [v9] Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8349910: Implement JEP 517: HTTP/3 for the HTTP Client API [v9] Daniel Fuchs
• RFR: 8365700: jar --validate without any --file option leaves around a temporary file /tmp/tmpJar<number>.jar Matthias Baesken
  • Re: RFR: 8365700: jar --validate without any --file option leaves around a temporary file /tmp/tmpJar<number>.jar Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8365700: Jar --validate without any --file option leaves around a temporary file /tmp/tmpJar<number>.jar Andreas Steiner
  • Re: RFR: 8365700: Jar --validate without any --file option leaves around a temporary file /tmp/tmpJar<number>.jar Matthias Baesken
  • Integrated: 8365700: Jar --validate without any --file option leaves around a temporary file /tmp/tmpJar<number>.jar Matthias Baesken
• Integrated: 8361842: Move input validation checks to Java for java.lang.StringCoding intrinsics Volkan Yazici
• RFR: 8365719: Refactor uses of JLA.uncheckedNewStringNoRepl Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8365719: Refactor uses of JLA.uncheckedNewStringNoRepl Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8365719: Refactor uses of JLA.uncheckedNewStringNoRepl Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8365719: Refactor uses of JLA.uncheckedNewStringNoRepl Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8365719: Refactor uses of JLA.uncheckedNewStringNoRepl Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8365719: Refactor uses of JLA.uncheckedNewStringNoRepl Volkan Yazici
  • Re: RFR: 8365719: Refactor uses of JLA.uncheckedNewStringNoRepl Johannes Döbler
  • Re: RFR: 8365719: Refactor uses of JLA.uncheckedNewStringNoRepl Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8365719: Refactor uses of JLA.uncheckedNewStringNoRepl Johannes Döbler
  • Integrated: 8365719: Refactor uses of JLA.uncheckedNewStringNoRepl Roger Riggs
• RFR: 8365398: TEST_BUG: java/rmi/transport/checkLeaseInfoLeak/CheckLeaseLeak.java failing intermittently Johny Jose
  • Re: RFR: 8365398: TEST_BUG: java/rmi/transport/checkLeaseInfoLeak/CheckLeaseLeak.java failing intermittently SendaoYan
  • Re: RFR: 8365398: TEST_BUG: java/rmi/transport/checkLeaseInfoLeak/CheckLeaseLeak.java failing intermittently SendaoYan
  • Re: RFR: 8365398: TEST_BUG: java/rmi/transport/checkLeaseInfoLeak/CheckLeaseLeak.java failing intermittently Jaikiran Pai
  • Re: RFR: 8365398: TEST_BUG: java/rmi/transport/checkLeaseInfoLeak/CheckLeaseLeak.java failing intermittently [v2] Mark Sheppard
  • Re: RFR: 8365398: TEST_BUG: java/rmi/transport/checkLeaseInfoLeak/CheckLeaseLeak.java failing intermittently [v3] Johny Jose
  • Re: RFR: 8365398: TEST_BUG: java/rmi/transport/checkLeaseInfoLeak/CheckLeaseLeak.java failing intermittently [v3] Johny Jose
  • Re: RFR: 8365398: TEST_BUG: java/rmi/transport/checkLeaseInfoLeak/CheckLeaseLeak.java failing intermittently [v3] Johny Jose
  • Re: RFR: 8365398: TEST_BUG: java/rmi/transport/checkLeaseInfoLeak/CheckLeaseLeak.java failing intermittently [v3] Mark Sheppard
• jpackage, wix and custom action Davide Perini
  • Re: jpackage, wix and custom action Alexey Semenyuk
  • Re: jpackage, wix and custom action Davide Perini
  • Re: [External] : Re: jpackage, wix and custom action Alexey Semenyuk
• Re: RFR: 8077587: BigInteger Roots [v73] fabioromano1
• RFR: 8365620: Using enhanced switch in MethodHandleDesc Shaojin Wen
  • Re: RFR: 8365620: Using enhanced switch in MethodHandleDesc Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8365620: Using enhanced switch in MethodHandleDesc Shaojin Wen
  • Re: RFR: 8365620: Using enhanced switch in MethodHandleDesc ExE Boss
  • Re: RFR: 8365620: Using enhanced switch in MethodHandleDesc Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8365620: Using enhanced switch in MethodHandleDesc David Alayachew
  • Re: RFR: 8365620: Using enhanced switch in MethodHandleDesc Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8365620: Using enhanced switch in MethodHandleDesc David Alayachew
  • Integrated: 8365620: Using enhanced switch in MethodHandleDesc Shaojin Wen
• RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early Alan Bateman
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v4] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v2] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v2] ExE Boss
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v2] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v3] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v4] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v4] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v4] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v4] John R Rose
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v4] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v4] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v5] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v5] ExE Boss
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v5] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v5] ExE Boss
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v5] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v5] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v6] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v7] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v8] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v8] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v8] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v9] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v9] Jason Mehrens
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v9] ExE Boss
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v9] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v10] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v10] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v10] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v10] David Holmes
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v10] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v11] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v12] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v12] Albert Mingkun Yang
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v12] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v12] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v12] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v12] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v12] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v14] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v14] ExE Boss
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v13] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v13] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v13] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v13] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v13] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v13] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v13] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v13] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v15] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v15] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v15] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v15] Roger Riggs
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v16] Guanqiang Han
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v16] Chen Liang
  • Re: RFR: 8328874: Class::forName0 should validate the class name length early [v16] Roger Riggs

• Earlier messages
• Later messages