On Tue, 7 Oct 2025 15:52:12 GMT, Chen Liang <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thanks for prompting for attention on the mailing list. Thanks for looking. > > I just wonder if it would be better for us to handle this in `os::dll_load` > in `os_windows.cpp` - this seems a better way to handle generic > platform-specific peculiarities. This approach also means JNI and all other > users would be updated too, but I don't see why JNI would handle this > differently from class loader APIs. This is a good suggestion. I've now updated do append the dot in `os_windows.cpp`'s `dll_load`. I suppose this turns it in a hotspot review rather than a core-libs change? ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/24694#issuecomment-3377943193
