On Fri, 24 Oct 2025 10:39:00 GMT, Viktor Klang <[email protected]> wrote:
>> The only change here is using the "##" in the link. So this is pre-existing >> wording (not changed in this update). I agree it could be mis-read and okay >> to change it. I think it's more about extending it for when a result (from >> join) is derived from the result of a subtask. I'll see if I can come up >> with better wording. > > Sounds great, thanks Alan! I've expanded it to split the two cases (a successful outcome from Subtask.get or Subtask.exception) vs. a subtask outcome that contributes to the result or exception from join. Hopefully it is clear to read now. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/27392#discussion_r2459998423
