On Tue, 16 Dec 2025 15:45:15 GMT, Jatin Bhateja <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> I suggest creating a seperate PR for this ? You can either create a >>> smaller standalone reproducer testcase or mention about the tests part of >>> this PR. >> >> Hi @jbhateja, thanks for the suggestion. Based on the comments here - >> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8373574, is it ok if my fix (along with >> a regression test as suggested) be part of this PR? > >> > I suggest creating a seperate PR for this ? You can either create a >> > smaller standalone reproducer testcase or mention about the tests part of >> > this PR. >> >> Hi @jbhateja, thanks for the suggestion. Based on the comments here - >> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8373574, is it ok if my fix (along with >> a regression test as suggested) be part of this PR? > > Hi @Bhavana-Kilambi , As @TobiHartmann suggested we can included your patch > with the PR. > Best Regards Thanks @jatin-bhateja for including AArch64 changes to the patch. Also @TobiHartmann suggested (here - https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8373574) that it'd be good to have a regression test for the AArch64 failures. I have put together a small JTREG test taking one of the VectorAPI tests from `TestFloat16VectorOperations.java` introduced in this PR (which was the one failing on AArch64). Could you please include the testcase as well? The patch is attached here [test.patch](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/24235556/test.patch) ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/28002#issuecomment-3670100491
