> The original implementation of UMIN/UMAX reductions in JDK-8346174 used 
> incorrect identity values in the Java implementation and test code.
> 
> Problem:
> --------
> UMIN was using MAX_OR_INF (signed maximum value) as the identity:
>   - Byte.MAX_VALUE (127) instead of max unsigned byte (255)
>   - Short.MAX_VALUE (32767) instead of max unsigned short (65535)
>   - Integer.MAX_VALUE instead of max unsigned int (-1)
>   - Long.MAX_VALUE instead of max unsigned long (-1)
> 
> UMAX was using MIN_OR_INF (signed minimum value) as the identity:
>   - Byte.MIN_VALUE (-128) instead of 0
>   - Short.MIN_VALUE (-32768) instead of 0
>   - Integer.MIN_VALUE instead of 0
>   - Long.MIN_VALUE instead of 0
> 
> This caused incorrect result. For example:
>   UMAX([42,42,...,42]) returned 128 instead of 42
> 
> Solution:
> ---------
> Use correct unsigned identity values:
>   - UMIN: ($type$)-1 (maximum unsigned value)
>   - UMAX: ($type$)0 (minimum unsigned value)
> 
> Changes:
> --------
> - X-Vector.java.template: Fixed identity values in reductionOperations
> - gen-template.sh: Fixed identity values for test code generation
> - templates/Unit-header.template: Updated copyright year to 2025
> - Regenerated all Vector classes and test files
> 
> Testing:
> --------
> All types (byte/short/int/long) now return correct results in both 
> interpreter mode (-Xint) and compiled mode.

Eric Fang has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit 
since the last revision:

  Refine the tests for identity values

-------------

Changes:
  - all: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/28692/files
  - new: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/28692/files/d685d3df..b5237a28

Webrevs:
 - full: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=28692&range=03
 - incr: https://webrevs.openjdk.org/?repo=jdk&pr=28692&range=02-03

  Stats: 8949 lines in 42 files changed: 5473 ins; 2384 del; 1092 mod
  Patch: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/28692.diff
  Fetch: git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/28692/head:pull/28692

PR: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/28692

Reply via email to