On Mon, 12 Jan 2026 23:53:03 GMT, David Beaumont <[email protected]> wrote:
> What you're suggesting is closer to my original change. I didn't see the original change but from a quick scan now, then it does look better in that it avoids BasicImageReader needing any reference to the jimage tool. It doesn't help with Roger's suggestion on using the runtime or class file version but I think would be harder to do because of how this gets built. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/28456#issuecomment-3744369033
