On Mon, 26 Jan 2026 14:05:01 GMT, Eirik Bjørsnøs <[email protected]> wrote:
>> test/jdk/jdk/internal/loader/URLClassPath/JarClassPathDfsOrder.java line 46: >> >>> 44: /* >>> 45: * @test >>> 46: * @bug 8375580 >> >> The OpenJDK dev guide has been updated to clarify when to use the `@bug` on >> tests https://openjdk.org/guide/. As per the guideline: >> >>> These bug ids refer to product bugs for which a fix is verified by this >>> test. JBS issues that track changes to the test itself are not listed here. >> >> This wasn't a product bug, so the `@bug` isn't necessary for this new test. > >> This wasn't a product bug, so the `@bug` isn't necessary for this new test. > > Yes, thanks! I must have thought this was a "product change", but the > requirement is indeed a product bug. Tag removed. I added `noreg-cleanup` to the issue. The rule is that if there's no test with an `@bug` that refers to the issue, then the issue should have a `noreg-xxx` label. Given that this fix is supposed to be a simple refactoring that leaves the behavior unchanged I believe that `noreg-cleanup` applies. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/29288#discussion_r2728062895
