On Thu, 29 Jan 2026 04:47:55 GMT, David Holmes <[email protected]> wrote:
>> JDK-8364343 upgraded the virtual thread transition management to be
>> independent of JVMTI. We can update java_lang_Thread::async_get_stack_trace
>> to use it and remove the suspend + retry code from Thread.getStackTrace.
>>
>> A summary of the changes:
>>
>> - java_lang_Thread::async_get_stack_trace is changed to use the new
>> handshake op so it can be called to get the stack trace of a started thread
>> in any state
>> - Thread::getStackTrace is changed to use async_get_stack_trace for all cases
>> - The SUSPENDED substate in VirtualThread is removed
>> - JVM_CreateThreadSnapshot is changed to be usable when JVMTI is not
>> compiled in
>> - ThreadSnapshotFactory::get_thread_snapshot is changed to not upcall to
>> StackTraceElement to complete the init of the stack trace
>>
>> The changes mean that Thread::getStackTrace may be slower when sampling a
>> virtual thread in transition. This case should be rare, and it isn't really
>> a performance critical op anyway. I prototyped use a spin loop and an
>> increasing wait time in MountUnmountDisabler::disable_transition_for_one to
>> avoid the wait(10) but decided to leave it out for now. Future work may
>> examine this issue as there may be other cases (with JVMTI) that would
>> benefit from avoiding the wait.
>>
>> A future PR might propose to change Thread.getStackTrace to use
>> ThreadSnapshot and allow java_lang_Thread::async_get_stack_trace be removed.
>> This requires more extensive changes to ThreadSnapshotFactory to reduce
>> overhead when only the stack trace is required.
>>
>> Testing: tier1-5. The changes has been already been tested in the loom repo
>> for a few months.
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/StackTraceElement.java line 578:
>
>> 576: }
>> 577:
>> 578: static StackTraceElement[] finishInit(StackTraceElement[]
>> stackTrace) {
>
> Out of curiousity what does this actually do, and why do we need it?
The format depends on whether the class loader has a name and other complexity
as to whether a module version is included. Nothing has changed, only the name
of the method to finish the initialization.
-------------
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/29461#discussion_r2740630911
