On Wed, 28 Jan 2026 01:49:52 GMT, Eric Fang <[email protected]> wrote:

>> `VectorMaskCastNode` is used to cast a vector mask from one type to another 
>> type. The cast may be generated by calling the vector API `cast` or 
>> generated by the compiler. For example, some vector mask operations like 
>> `trueCount` require the input mask to be integer types, so for floating 
>> point type masks, the compiler will cast the mask to the corresponding 
>> integer type mask automatically before doing the mask operation. This kind 
>> of cast is very common.
>> 
>> If the vector element size is not changed, the `VectorMaskCastNode` don't 
>> generate code, otherwise code will be generated to extend or narrow the 
>> mask. This IR node is not free no matter it generates code or not because it 
>> may block some optimizations. For example:
>> 1. `(VectorStoremask (VectorMaskCast (VectorLoadMask x)))` The middle 
>> `VectorMaskCast` prevented the following optimization: `(VectorStoremask 
>> (VectorLoadMask x)) => (x)`
>> 2. `(VectorMaskToLong (VectorMaskCast (VectorLongToMask x)))`, which blocks 
>> the optimization `(VectorMaskToLong (VectorLongToMask x)) => (x)`.
>> 
>> In these IR patterns, the value of the input `x` is not changed, so we can 
>> safely do the optimization. But if the input value is changed, we can't 
>> eliminate the cast.
>> 
>> The general idea of this PR is introducing an `uncast_mask` helper function, 
>> which can be used to uncast a chain of `VectorMaskCastNode`, like the 
>> existing `Node::uncast(bool)` function. The funtion returns the first non 
>> `VectorMaskCastNode`.
>> 
>> The intended use case is when the IR pattern to be optimized may contain one 
>> or more consecutive `VectorMaskCastNode` and this does not affect the 
>> correctness of the optimization. Then this function can be called to 
>> eliminate the `VectorMaskCastNode` chain.
>> 
>> Current optimizations related to `VectorMaskCastNode` include:
>> 1. `(VectorMaskCast (VectorMaskCast x)) => (x)`, see JDK-8356760.
>> 2. `(XorV (VectorMaskCast (VectorMaskCmp src1 src2 cond)) (Replicate -1)) => 
>> (VectorMaskCast (VectorMaskCmp src1 src2 ncond))`, see JDK-8354242.
>> 
>> This PR does the following optimizations:
>> 1. Extends the optimization pattern `(VectorMaskCast (VectorMaskCast x)) => 
>> (x)` as `(VectorMaskCast (VectorMaskCast  ... (VectorMaskCast x))) => (x)`. 
>> Because as long as types of the head and tail `VectorMaskCastNode` are 
>> consistent, the optimization is correct.
>> 2. Supports a new optimization pattern `(VectorStoreMask (VectorMaskCast ... 
>> (VectorLoadMask x))) => (x)`. Since the value before and after the pattern 
>> is a boolean vect...
>
> Eric Fang has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional 
> commit since the last revision:
> 
>   Add clearer comments to VectorMaskCastIdentityTest.java

test/hotspot/jtreg/compiler/vectorapi/VectorStoreMaskIdentityTest.java line 288:

> 286:     @IR(counts = { IRNode.VECTOR_LOAD_MASK, "= 0",
> 287:                    IRNode.VECTOR_STORE_MASK, "= 0",
> 288:                    IRNode.VECTOR_MASK_CAST, "= 0" },

Can we also check `IRNode.LOAD_VECTOR` to make sure these APIs are intrinsified 
successfully, and the nodes are eliminated by `VectorStoreMask::Identity()` ? 
Because if these APIs are not intrinsified due to some reasons, above IRs do 
not exist as well.

test/hotspot/jtreg/compiler/vectorapi/VectorStoreMaskIdentityTest.java line 289:

> 287:                    IRNode.VECTOR_STORE_MASK, "= 0",
> 288:                    IRNode.VECTOR_MASK_CAST, "= 0" },
> 289:         applyIfCPUFeatureOr = { "asimd", "true", "avx2", "true" },

This might not affect the result because it has `applyIf = { "MaxVectorSize", 
"> 16" }` check additionally. But it will more accurate if:
Suggestion:

        applyIfCPUFeatureOr = { "sve", "true", "avx2", "true" },

because the max vector size for neon is 16-byte.

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/28313#discussion_r2753114650
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/28313#discussion_r2753117731

Reply via email to