On Thu, 26 Feb 2026 11:28:17 GMT, Jaikiran Pai <[email protected]> wrote:
> Can I please get a review of this change which addresses the issue noted in > https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8369181? > > As noted in that issue, if `finish()` is called on a `InflaterOutputStream` > that was constructed without passing a `Inflater`, then any subsequent > `write()`s on that `InflaterOutputStream` result in an > `IllegalStateException`, because we close the `Inflater` in `finish()`. The > commit in this PR, fixes the issue by throwing the specified `IOException` in > place of the `IllegalStateException`. > > At the same time, the documentation of `finish()` has been enhanced to > clarify the current behaviour, through a `@implSpec`. > > Alternative approaches of deprecating finish() and/or not closing the default > Inflater were considered, but given the current long standing implementation > of finish(), it was decided to merely specify the current behaviour of > closing the default Inflater in finish(). > > A new jtreg test has been added to reproduce the issue and verify the fix. > tier1, tier2, tier3 testing of this change completed without any related > issues. > > I'll file a CSR shortly for this change. src/java.base/share/classes/java/util/zip/InflaterOutputStream.java line 224: > 222: > 223: /** > 224: * Forces writing any pending buffered decompressed data to the > output stream, What you would think about dropping the term "Force" from this method, and flush. They can simply say that they write any pending buffered decompress data to the underlying output stream. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/29935#discussion_r2863651878
