On Fri, 6 Mar 2026 07:18:41 GMT, Alan Bateman <[email protected]> wrote:
> (Going further, it might actually be useful to show the Unicode version for > Java 21 even though it wasn't upgraded in that release. That avoids a reader > needing to realize that it's the upgrades that are only shown when they > really just want to see what Unicode version is in JDK $N release) Initially I thought listing LTSes in the expanded list, and put others collapsed. Then I thought LTS is an Oracle thing and not Java SE spec (although it's de-facto), so I am kind of hesitant to list them (CLDR might be OK as it is JDK imp). Thus ended up to list the recent 5 releases. Do you think it is OK to put Oracle's LTSes in the expanded supported Unicode versions? ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/30099#issuecomment-4012988775
