On Wed, 20 May 2026 08:02:58 GMT, Quan Anh Mai <[email protected]> wrote:

>> Hi,
>> 
>> I was reminded of this forgotten PR when reviewing a counted loop 
>> transformation PR. The important point is that it is easier and more 
>> efficient to compute the trip count of a counted loop using unsigned 
>> division. Currently, for int counted loops, trip count is computed by 
>> extending the loop parameters to long and doing a signed long division. This 
>> cannot be applied to long counted loop. As a result, as a precondition for 
>> long counted loop predication, we need to be able to efficiently transform 
>> an unsigned division by constant.
>> 
>> For more information, please refer to #9947 .
>> 
>> Testing:
>> 
>> - [x] tier1-4,hs-comp-stress
>> 
>> Please take a look and leave your review, thanks a lot.
>> 
>> ---------
>> - [x] I confirm that I make this contribution in accordance with the 
>> [OpenJDK Interim AI Policy](https://openjdk.org/legal/ai).
>
> Quan Anh Mai has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a 
> merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains 100 commits:
> 
>  - Fix comments, remove dead code
>  - Merge branch 'master' into unsignedDiv
>  - Various fixes
>  - Fix IntegerDivValueTests
>  - Fix merge conflicts
>  - Merge branch 'master' into unsignedDiv
>  - Merge branch 'master' into unsignedDiv
>  - fix tests
>  - Merge branch 'master' into unsignedDiv
>  - further clarify variable meanings
>  - ... and 90 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/45e66b6a...e991bb28

test/micro/org/openjdk/bench/java/lang/IntegerDivMod.java line 27:

> 25: import java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit;
> 26: import java.util.random.RandomGeneratorFactory;
> 27: 

Same question here as well.

test/micro/org/openjdk/bench/java/lang/LongDivMod.java line 27:

> 25: import java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit;
> 26: import java.util.random.RandomGeneratorFactory;
> 27: 

Is there a reason for changing the order of these imports?

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/31033#discussion_r3292510280
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/31033#discussion_r3292511765

Reply via email to