On Wed, 27 May 2026 16:16:20 GMT, Paul Sandoz <[email protected]> wrote:
>> This is looking good. There are two related issues: >> >> 1. [JDK-8381809](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8381809) Template >> Framework Library: add Float16Vector type >> 2. [JDK-8373574](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8373574) AArch64: 'bad >> AD file' in couple of FP16 vectorAPI tests >> >> I think it reasonable that this PR is not blocked by 1 and we can follow up >> after its integration. What about 2? > >> Hi @PaulSandoz , As per the following comment fix for JDK-8373574 is >> included in this patch. [#28002 >> (comment)](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/28002#issuecomment-3661203155) >> >> Patch has been regressed by @XiaohongGong on AARCH64 > > Great! would you mind closing down > [JDK-8373574](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8373574) as duplicate of > the issue for this PR or update 8373574 to focus on a regression test if one > is not added to this PR? > @PaulSandoz @jatin-bhateja I saw that there is already a PR for the template > fuzzer, so I'd like to review that one too, so we can integrate the two > things in close succession. As we have seen with the rest of the Vector API > before: fuzzing revealed a good number of bugs that our hand-written tests > did not cover. Integrating tests later means we discover bugs later, and that > puts more pressure on the compiler team - I'd like to avoid that ;) > > #30997 Understood. We are getting very close to RDP1, after we still have time to add more tests but not features. @jatin-bhateja is #30997 ready for testing with this PR? ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/28002#issuecomment-4556433927
