On Tue, 9 Jun 2026 05:55:31 GMT, Emanuel Peter <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> @jatin-bhateja In that regard: the Vector API still has lots of unrelated >>> bugs, but that should not block you here. But: those JDK27 bugs have higher >>> priority for us. >>> >>> The 3 related issues: are all bugs in the fuzzer changes, of the companion >>> PR. We'll have to fix those issues there. >>> >>> But so far, I think testing has not revealed any issues with this PR here. >> >> Hi @eme64 , >> Thanks for a very thorough testing and filing the bugs. >> As discussed I will work on the feedback on fuzzer pull request seperately. >> >> May I request you to kindly approve this pull request, we may also need >> reapproval from @PaulSandoz or @xuemingshen-oracle >> >> Best Regards >> Jatin > > @jatin-bhateja I now ran one more round of sanity testing, after your most > recent update. > > Once these tests pass, I can give my approval, with the following expectation: > - Follow-up issue for `toString` and `hashCode` are filed, and assigned, and > soon addressed. > - The template fuzzer patch is completed before any further `Float16Vector` > enhancements are integrated. > > @jatin-bhateja do you think this is reasonable? Thanks @eme64 , @XiaohongGong for your approvals. Hi @PaulSandoz , @xuemingshen-oracle , It seems we need your re-approvals. Here is the link to follow-up issue on Float16Vector.toString https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8386322 ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/28002#issuecomment-4667748727
