On Wed, 10 Jun 2026 16:03:36 GMT, Viktor Klang <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I think one test suffices, adding documentation that if it ever fails, to >> further investigate the other classes. > > Thanks for the input, Doug. I have added some verbiage to that effect for the > regression test. As a person that worked in dev & QA, I would still rather create an additional test for AQLS (if somebody would modify AQLS alone, we are covered). It looks like it should be easy: there is already `AbstractQueuedLongSynchronizerTest.Mutex` class with `tryAcquireNanos()`. Just my opinion. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/31436#discussion_r3390748277
