On Thu, 9 Jul 2026 09:38:56 GMT, Jan Lahoda <[email protected]> wrote:
> The `java`' man page does not speak about the new forms of main method, this > PR updates it to include these new forms, and also generally updates the > text. This was noted and written by abuckley. > > I am attaching images how the rendered man page looks in HTML and in a > terminal: > <img width="2731" height="417" alt="html" > src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/6ebc5ff7-93cd-497a-bd52-a9045f520b68"; > /> > <img width="3142" height="417" alt="man" > src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/bd09ac3a-95b3-46c5-87f9-4aae0fddb2bf"; > /> > > > --------- > - [X] I confirm that I make this contribution in accordance with the [OpenJDK > Interim AI Policy](https://openjdk.org/legal/ai). src/java.base/share/man/java.md line 99: > 97: By default, the first argument that isn't an option of the `java` command > indicates > 98: the fully qualified name of the main class. If `-jar` is specified, then > its > 99: argument is the name of the JAR file containing class and resource files > for the Pre-existing: this doesn't account for the `-m` module mode. src/java.base/share/man/java.md line 103: > 101: the manifest of the JAR file. > 102: > 103: Arguments after the main class name or the JAR file name are passed to Pre-existing: this doesn't account for the `-m` module mode. src/java.base/share/man/java.md line 104: > 102: > 103: Arguments after the main class name or the JAR file name are passed to > 104: the `main()` method. The `main()` method may be a static method or an > instance I would suggest starting a new paragraph to describe what a `main` method may look like. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/31841#discussion_r3555340748 PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/31841#discussion_r3555341451 PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/31841#discussion_r3555344261
