On Mon, 13 Jul 2026 15:19:17 GMT, Sean Mullan <[email protected]> wrote:
> Alternate implementation - this version only contains one argument - the name > of the properties file. If an include statement is needed, it should be > inserted in the properties file and it will always be added as the last line > of the the conf/security/java.security configuration file.. > > See https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/30635 for the other implementation. > > This is a new jlink plugin which allows the user to specify values of > security properties it wants to override in the conf/security/java.security > configuration file in a custom runtime image. This enhancement, along with > https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/29700 allow users to more easily create > runtimes that address the specific security requirements of their > applications. > > The command-line syntax takes a file containing properties that the user > wants to override. The file can also contain an include statement which will > be added as the last line of the conf/security/java.security configuration > file. > > For example: > > jlink --security-properties props.security > > where props.security is a file containing one more more properties in the > java.security file syntax. > > --------- > - [x] I confirm that I make this contribution in accordance with the [OpenJDK > Interim AI Policy](https://openjdk.org/legal/ai). @franferrax Please have a look at this alternate implementation of JDK-8377819 and let me know which version you prefer. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/31884#issuecomment-4959556261
