On Fri, 21 Aug 2026 15:31:59 GMT, ExE Boss <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Would it not be better to move the implementation classes to `jdk.internal` >>> just like the Vector API does? >> >> @minborg `java.base` cannot depend on an incubating module. > >> > Would it not be better to move the implementation classes to >> > `jdk.internal` just like the Vector API does? >> >> @minborg `java.base` cannot depend on an incubating module. > > `jdk.internal` is not actually a restricted package namespace like `java.*` > is.
@ExE-Boss `jdk.internal` can be exported to `jdk.incubator.json`, but classes in `jdk.internal` cannot implement API interfaces declared in `jdk.incubator.json`. ------------- PR Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/32282#issuecomment-5373012464
