On Fri, 4 Sep 2026 18:08:52 GMT, Naoto Sato <[email protected]> wrote:
>> This PR implements [JEP 540: Simple JSON API >> (Incubator)](https://openjdk.org/jeps/540). >> >> It adds the `jdk.incubator.json` module which provides APIs for reading and >> writing JSON documents as specified by [RFC >> 8259](https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8259). This is an incubating >> API. >> >> API documentation: >> https://cr.openjdk.org/~naoto/json/javadoc/api/jdk.incubator.json/module-summary.html >> Co-authored-by: Justin Lu >> ([@justin-curtis-lu](https://github.com/justin-curtis-lu)), Stuart Marks >> ([@stuart-marks](https://github.com/stuart-marks)) >> >> --------- >> - [x] I confirm that I make this contribution in accordance with the >> [OpenJDK Interim AI Policy](https://openjdk.org/legal/ai). > > Naoto Sato has updated the pull request incrementally with three additional > commits since the last revision: > > - Merge remote-tracking branch 'jdk-sandbox/json' into > JDK-8381976-Implementation-for-Simple-JSON-API > - Replace in-line occurrences of RFC 8259 with link > - CSR review - JV.toString() src/jdk.incubator.json/share/classes/jdk/incubator/json/JsonObject.java line 38: > 36: * The interface that represents JSON object. > 37: * <p> > 38: * A {@code JsonObject} can be produced by {@link Json#parse(String)}. At some point, the package description was updated to have "can be done with Json.parse(String) or Json.parse(char[])". Do you want to add the overload to JsonObject (and the other classes) too. Initially I was wondering about "produce" vs. "done" too but it's probably okay for now, maybe smooth out some of the wording in a future update. ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/32282#discussion_r3947596563
