On Mon, 21 Sep 2026 07:50:16 GMT, Chen Liang <[email protected]> wrote:
>> The identity hash code of value objects currently can produce 0. A zero >> value is usually not anticipated for System.identityHashCode calls unless >> the argument is null; the 0 hash also cannot be cached. Thus, we should move >> away from the 0 hash. >> >> --------- >> - [x] I confirm that I make this contribution in accordance with the >> [OpenJDK Interim AI Policy](https://openjdk.org/legal/ai). > > Chen Liang has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional > commit since the last revision: > > Review test/hotspot/jtreg/runtime/Unsafe/HashCodeMask.java line 29: > 27: * @library /test/lib > 28: * @modules java.base/jdk.internal.misc > 29: * java.management Is the use of `java.management` module an oversight? ------------- PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/32660#discussion_r4060192538
