On Thu, 15 Oct 2026 23:19:53 GMT, Justin Lu <[email protected]> wrote:
> Make CNF plural rule handling use possessive grouped matching. Non-possessive > matching is not required, because the different components do not conflict > with each other. In practice, these test cases are unrealistic. However, they > are still within the defined implementation limits. > > --------- > - [x] I confirm that I make this contribution in accordance with the [OpenJDK > Interim AI Policy](https://openjdk.org/legal/ai). LGTM test/jdk/java/text/Format/CompactNumberFormat/PluralProcessingTest.java line 57: > 55: void longPluralRulesTest(String rule) { > 56: new CompactNumberFormat("#", > DecimalFormatSymbols.getInstance(Locale.ROOT), > 57: new String[]{""}, rule); This could be wrapped with `assertDoesNotThrow` to make the test's intention more explicit. ------------- PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/33394#pullrequestreview-5551687076 PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/33394#discussion_r4297697182
