On Mon, 19 Oct 2026 15:42:36 GMT, Fredrik Bredberg <[email protected]> 
wrote:

>> This PR reduces the Thread-SMR (Safe Memory Reclamation) related cost of 
>> starting and exiting threads.
>> 
>> Both starting and exiting a thread create a new `ThreadsList` and retire the 
>> old one. Previously, we used to scan the hazard pointers of all threads when 
>> a `ThreadsList` was retired. This made the execution cost increasingly 
>> higher as more threads were started.
>> 
>> This PR tackles the problem in three ways:
>> 
>> 1. By not scanning hazard pointers every time a new thread is started. 
>> Instead, we defer the scanning until either 16 `ThreadsLists` have been 
>> retired or the retired lists occupy at least 4 MB of memory.
>> 2. We use the scan that is performed when removing a thread to also 
>> determine if it's safe to delete the thread, and thereby we potentially 
>> avoid a costly re-scan in `wait_until_not_protected()`.
>> 3. By checking if there is no retired `ThreadsList` that can protect the 
>> thread, `wait_until_not_protected()` can also avoid a re-scan.
>> 
>> I've run the ThreadStart reproducer that is attached to 
>> [JDK-8307970](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8307970). Depending on the 
>> number of idle threads, the changes in this PR show that threads start up to 
>> ~63% faster (or in other words, a ~39% reduction in time to start a thread).
>> 
>> To go further than this likely requires a major rewrite of the Thread-SMR 
>> system, which would not be a walk in the park.
>> 
>> Passes tier1-3 tests.
>> 
>> ---------
>> - [x] I confirm that I make this contribution in accordance with the 
>> [OpenJDK Interim AI Policy](https://openjdk.org/legal/ai).
>
> Fredrik Bredberg has updated the pull request incrementally with one 
> additional commit since the last revision:
> 
>   Update for Patricio

These are excellent improvements to make - great find. Changes look good to me.

Thanks

src/hotspot/share/runtime/threadSMR.cpp line 1162:

> 1160:       MutexLocker ml(Threads_lock);
> 1161:       // ThreadsSMRSupport::remove_thread() has removed the thread
> 1162:       // from the current ThreadsList. But an older retired

Suggestion:

      // from the current ThreadsList, but an older retired

-------------

Marked as reviewed by dholmes (Reviewer).

PR Review: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/33166#pullrequestreview-5580588903
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/33166#discussion_r4321312879

Reply via email to