On 16 March 2015 at 21:06, Barry Warsaw <ba...@python.org> wrote:
> On Mar 16, 2015, at 09:52 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>
>>I've found one neat trick for this kind of scenario is to devise
>>standalone projects that are likely to be useful regardless of what
>>happens in the broader context. REST-API-in-upstream-Roundup
>>qualifies
>

Hi,

I am currently looking at the design of Roundup[1]. Would a standalone
project as mentioned above be bugs.python.org roundup specific or
would it target upstream? Which would serve *us* better?
In either case, would someone familiar with bugs.python.org roundup
point me to the differences between bugs.python.org from the upstream
version?(if any)

[1] - http://roundup.sourceforge.net/docs/design.html



-- 
Regards
Saimadhav Heblikar
_______________________________________________
core-workflow mailing list
core-workflow@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/core-workflow
This list is governed by the PSF Code of Conduct: 
https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct

Reply via email to