On 16 March 2015 at 21:06, Barry Warsaw <ba...@python.org> wrote: > On Mar 16, 2015, at 09:52 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote: > >>I've found one neat trick for this kind of scenario is to devise >>standalone projects that are likely to be useful regardless of what >>happens in the broader context. REST-API-in-upstream-Roundup >>qualifies >
Hi, I am currently looking at the design of Roundup[1]. Would a standalone project as mentioned above be bugs.python.org roundup specific or would it target upstream? Which would serve *us* better? In either case, would someone familiar with bugs.python.org roundup point me to the differences between bugs.python.org from the upstream version?(if any) [1] - http://roundup.sourceforge.net/docs/design.html -- Regards Saimadhav Heblikar _______________________________________________ core-workflow mailing list core-workflow@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/core-workflow This list is governed by the PSF Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct