> On Jul 23, 2018, at 4:34 AM, Victor Stinner <vstin...@redhat.com> wrote: > > 2018-07-23 3:28 GMT+02:00 Berker Peksağ <berker.pek...@gmail.com>: >> On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 9:49 PM, Mariatta Wijaya >> <mariatta.wij...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Several of its features I'd like to try out for now: >>> - automatically add size labels on pull requests. It can analyze the content >>> of the pull request, and apply the size labels (xs, s, m, etc) >> >> It would be better if we use less labels, to be honest. Even now, the >> amount of labels and different colors make the pull request list >> harder to look at: https://github.com/python/cpython/pulls >> >> And I don't find these labels useful especially if there is no way to >> ignore auto-generated files such as Python/importlib.h. > > I concur with Berker. More and more PR look like a blinking christmas > tree :-) IMHO labels doesn't add much value for the reviews.
A couple of years ago, I completely agreed that the labels were distracting when we were using them on Jupyter. Over time, I found that they were very helpful for triaging issues and viewing status/next actions when you have a large number of PRs. One thing that I found helped quite a bit with the Christmas tree effect was to standardize the color scheme to either all black lettering on muted color or all white lettering on bright color. > > Victor > _______________________________________________ > core-workflow mailing list -- core-workflow@python.org > To unsubscribe send an email to core-workflow-le...@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mm3/mailman3/lists/core-workflow.python.org/ > This list is governed by the PSF Code of Conduct: > https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct _______________________________________________ core-workflow mailing list -- core-workflow@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to core-workflow-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mm3/mailman3/lists/core-workflow.python.org/ This list is governed by the PSF Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct
