On Feb 13, 2008 9:05 AM, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alternatives are "-" (used by memreserve and inside names) or ":" (used > by memreg) or "_" (used inside names). I hope at least one of them is > considered as reasonable alternative. @ in this case seperates the type of resources (pci) from the instance of it (device, function). So @ is a seperator. Using _ will add ambiguity as it is NOT a seperator. same problem for -. Stepan, will the OFW guys kill us if we allow ':' as well as @. I still am not sure that allowing @ AND : is really that good an idea -- it means some dts files will not look like others; and if we put the dts binary blob in the lar, tools that translate the blob to source (such as the dtc itself) will print @, not :. I'm happy to allow ':' but be aware it's not problem-free. thanks ron -- coreboot mailing list [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
