On 13.02.2008 04:58, ron minnich wrote:
> On Feb 12, 2008 3:02 PM, Corey Osgood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Feb 12, 2008 3:15 PM, ron minnich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On Feb 12, 2008 11:13 AM, Peter Stuge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
>>>>> mainboard-vendor = "Emulation";
>>>>> mainboard-name = "QEMU x86";
>>>>>
>> Can we possibly pull this info (or defaults for this info) from Kconfig?
>
> Sure, I am fine with that. Comments?
>
Why not? But let's do that step in another patch.
> Here is the dts again.
>
> /{
> mainboard-vendor = "Emulation";
> mainboard-name = "QEMU x86";
> constructor = "qemuvga_constructors";
> cpus {};
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] {
> /config/("northbridge/intel/i440bxemulation/dts");
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] {
> [EMAIL PROTECTED],0 {
> };
> [EMAIL PROTECTED],0 {
> /config/("southbridge/intel/i82371eb/dts");
> };
> };
> };
> };
>
>
> That's the whole file.
>
> Let's try to bring this to closure. The score so far.
>
> Stepan: is ok with '@' syntax (as are segher etc. )
> Ron: is not that concerned either way as long as an alternative
> carl-daniel, peter, corey: do not like @ syntax but need to propose a
> reasonable alternative (they have tried but not totally there yet)
> which does not make the parser hard to modify.
>
Alternatives are "-" (used by memreserve and inside names) or ":" (used
by memreg) or "_" (used inside names). I hope at least one of them is
considered as reasonable alternative.
Regards,
Carl-Daniel
--
http://www.hailfinger.org/
--
coreboot mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
