On 14.02.2008 23:25, Stefan Reinauer wrote:
> * ron minnich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080214 23:18]:
>
>>> > [EMAIL PROTECTED],0 {
>>> > disabled;
>>> > }
>>>
>>> This is an interesting idea but the devices are CS5536 specific and I
>>> don't think we want to make dts CS5536 aware. I think it better use the
>>> device ID rather than the device location to do the disable.
>>>
>> But, stefan, to disable, you have to make a VSA call. ow ow ow ow ow
>> ... for putting that into dts :-)
>>
>
> But that VSA call is made no matter how we describe it in the dts.
>
> The CS5536 code should know what to do if a dts asks it to disable a
> device or the other. Not sure.
>
Indeed. That would solve the problem very nicely without putting hacks
into the dts.
Regards,
Carl-Daniel
--
http://www.hailfinger.org/
--
coreboot mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
