On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 06:35:35PM -0500, Tom Sylla wrote: > What does "disabled" mean for a real hardware device in the dts?
Spot on. > I am pretty sure it does not mean "hide the header" (that is not > possible in general, it is a VSA-ism). It might. ATA devices, USB, 1394 etc could be disabled => hidden in factory BIOSes. > What if I want the VPCI device to exist, but want it "disabled" in > the normal dts sense of "disable"? Why would you? And what would you expect 'the normal dts sense of "disable"' to mean in that case? > Overloading "disabled" in the dts makes that not possible (and is > also *really* confusing) Personally I would kind-of like the hiding to happen for all disabled devices. Am I way off track? //Peter -- coreboot mailing list [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
