On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 12:27:27PM +0200, Stefan Reinauer wrote: > > Who remembers details about this guy? > > > > flashrom hardcodes the flash chip address to 0x9400000 with > > -DTS5300 instead of the regular 4G-flash chip size. .. > > I want to get rid of the #define. Probe it or lose it! > > I say NACK to dropping this code. > > Please don't get the code drop frenzy! There are enough other open > working lots.
Just a little cleaning up. > On the TS5300 it was strapped to 0x9400000, other SC520 systems > may be configured differently. But basically all have their flash > at non-standard positions afaik. Hm? You say strapped, to me that means controlled by board design/jumpers. Is the address always set by hardware, and then that address is readable in the PAR registers? > If you want to write code to do the probing, I'll gladly ACK it. I won't write that until it can be tested by someone before commit. > I can't test anymore - the TS5300 stayed back at the linuxtag in > 07. No idea what happened to it. Maybe Carsten still has it? Does anyone else have access to a SC520 system? I hope you agree that it is not so useful to spend time on adding support for a 7+ year old board, which noone can test on, that has already been compiled out of the utility by default since forever. //Peter -- coreboot mailing list [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
