On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 07:20:22PM +0200, Stefan Reinauer wrote: > > Hm? You say strapped, to me that means controlled by board > > design/jumpers. Is the address always set by hardware, and > > then that address is readable in the PAR registers? > > I hint you to the SC520 manuals on AMDs web page.
Yeah, already had a look at some of them, nothing in the register doc, but I didn't yet check the users's guide even though it is supposed to detail BOOTCS# stuff. > > I hope you agree that it is not so useful to spend time on adding > > support for a 7+ year old board, which noone can test on, that has > > already been compiled out of the utility by default since forever. > > Absolutely my point. This is why the current state is possibly the > best it can get in this regard. .. > That code worked fine when I last tested it last year, so there's > absolutely no reason to remove it. Fair enough! If someone has a board with the SC520 and can help test, please speak up so we can have a generic board enable. (Carsten, still tuned in? Do you remember if you saw Stefan's board? I don't remember seeing it when we packed but it was a while ago. :\ ) //Peter -- coreboot mailing list [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
