On 01/07/08 05:44 +0200, Peter Stuge wrote: > The license could be debated. CC by-nd and by-sa were discussed, but > by-sa would let anyone do anything to it, which I don't think is a > good idea. I would prefer that we created any necessary variations > ourselves, and made them available for reuse. CC in general may not > be such a good fit for a logo. > > The current license is modeled after the OpenOffice.org logo license.
The current license isn't very friendly to commercial entities. As it stands, we are unable to use the logo in our signage, which would be a shame. We also couldn't put it into bayou since the license would be incompatible with the GPL. Can we consider CC-by-nd, please, to allow commercial reuse? And why is CC-by-sa out of the question? I think that the many variations of the Linux penguin has only served to enforce the brand, not dilute it. Jordan -- Jordan Crouse Systems Software Development Engineer Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. -- coreboot mailing list [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
