Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: > Interesting point of view. As long as we're allowed to make locking on > pure uniprocessor architectures a no-op, I'm totally for it. > > The thing is, without those defines, figuring out whether we're SMP or not is more complex than doing the actual locking. So we might as well do the locking unconditionally, too.
--
coresystems GmbH • Brahmsstr. 16 • D-79104 Freiburg i. Br.
Tel.: +49 761 7668825 • Fax: +49 761 7664613
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] • http://www.coresystems.de/
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Freiburg • HRB 7656
Geschäftsführer: Stefan Reinauer • Ust-IdNr.: DE245674866
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- coreboot mailing list [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
