On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 8:38 AM, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That means we either > - have to tell gcc that the stack moved in the middle of a function or > - redesign v3 stage1 completely. > > That sucks. Very much. > it's not that hard. You split stage1 in half. I had an implementation of this at one point until we decided to return from disable_car(). My opinion, then and now, is that NOT returning from disable_car is a more general solution, which future-proofs us against a stupid future CPU that could not return from disable_car(). There, I've said it. ron -- coreboot mailing list [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
