ron minnich wrote: > > Why would this not be possible? Change %sp and return. > > if you change sp you really can not return. That's the issue.
disable_car() would actually return to the caller, but the caller may make assumptions about the stack, correct? Anyway, I think call (that will also never return) from disable_car() is what I like best so far. But I don't think the new function should be a parameter, we should be generic enough to always continue in the same location. //Peter -- coreboot mailing list [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
