Andriy Gapon wrote: > I have an impression that qemu is used quite extensively for > coreboot code testing.
I think that's exaggerating. qemu is handy, but in general testing is not our strong suit. Also, qemu is only useful for testing coreboot code that is not board-specific, and that code is often already better understood/easier than board-specific code. To test board-specific tricky stuff we need actual hardware or a simulator like SimNow. > What do you think about the following: > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.qemu/30106 > ["register 20h" there should be changed to "register 59h"] Interesting. It's possible that we've never been bit by this. I'm also not a big qemu user so I hope others can comment too. //Peter -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
