On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 5:30 PM, Corey Osgood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've got a few more questions that I could probably figure out answers to by > testing, but hopefully it's easier just to ask: > > * If a device is defined in the dts, but disabled during > phase4_enable_disable which renders the device hidden, what will/should v3 > do?
the device should end up not even being found. marc felt that phase4_enable_disable was ill-defined and we are working on making this clearer. > > * If another device appears where the disabled device should have been (in > this case, the ide controller is now where sata used to be), what should > happen? Will the ide controller's config (that was intended for another > location) be used? In this case, it's D10F0 and F1. > It should not because the devid and vendor id should not match. > * phase4_enable_disable passes the actual device it's enabling/disabling, > right? yes. > > * What's the format of devfn (as in dev->path.pci.devfn)? dev << 4 | > function? > dev <<3 | fn ron -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
