Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
They don't know (or need to know) what ht links are connecting the cpu
and what ones go to pci bus.
They need a way to specify settings for any given PCI device. Since most
modern machines have multiple PCI devices with the same vendor/device
ID, we have to be able to identify devices based on their logical path.
For that, we have to model the logical PCI bus/device/tree reasonably
well. I'm trying to do that, but no model seems to fit.
I disagree. How would a two devices of the same type require
difference initialization? I think that defining where the devices are
at build time is wrong. You only need the ID and the functions that
device requires.
The best example I saw was multiple PCI express bridges with the same
ID, although only some of them were used by physical PCIe slots or
onboard PCIe devices. Factory BIOSes usually hide the unconnected
bridges and I'd be happy if we could do the same. AFAICS that requires
different initialization of devices with the same type.
This is an interesting problem to solve. If the customization is
something very specific to the platform it is difficult to do in the
device tree by variables settings. You end calling back to a custom
function anyway which could know how to set each device any number of
ways (with or without a dts).
I don't think that the dts is required at build time but both cases are
handled (variables and custom functions) so I think we should continue
on this path.
Marc
--
Marc Jones
Senior Firmware Engineer
(970) 226-9684 Office
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.amd.com/embeddedprocessors
--
coreboot mailing list: [email protected]
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot