On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 02:18:34AM +0100, Stefan Reinauer wrote: > Kevin O'Connor wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 01:17:46AM +0100, Stefan Reinauer wrote: > >>> BTW, in previous emails I highlighted some disadvantages with a > >>> tighter integration of seabios and coreboot. Could you elaborate on > >>> the reasons why you think this is the best option? > >>> > >> Simple: [...]
Thanks Stefan. I appreciate your feedback. One random comment: > > and we > > can avoid having to return from seabios to coreboot and thus not have > > to worry abou them "stomping" on each other. > > > We do have to worry about that in all scenarios though. > > Just assuming it's ok for SeaBIOS to overwrite memory that coreboot > filled is not good enough. I'm more worried about the option roms corrupting memory that coreboot uses. -Kevin -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
