On 07.11.2008 04:18, Kevin O'Connor wrote: > On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 02:18:34AM +0100, Stefan Reinauer wrote: > >> Kevin O'Connor wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 01:17:46AM +0100, Stefan Reinauer wrote: >>> >>>>> BTW, in previous emails I highlighted some disadvantages with a >>>>> tighter integration of seabios and coreboot. Could you elaborate on >>>>> the reasons why you think this is the best option? >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Simple: >>>> > [...] > > Thanks Stefan. I appreciate your feedback. > > One random comment: > > >>> and we >>> can avoid having to return from seabios to coreboot and thus not have >>> to worry abou them "stomping" on each other. >>> >>> >> We do have to worry about that in all scenarios though. >> >> Just assuming it's ok for SeaBIOS to overwrite memory that coreboot >> filled is not good enough. >> > > I'm more worried about the option roms corrupting memory that coreboot > uses. >
Checksums of coreboot memory before and after option rom execution could help. Regards, Carl-Daniel -- http://www.hailfinger.org/ -- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
