On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 9:55 AM, ron minnich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 8:50 AM, Myles Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > If we're going that way, I'd rather just use what we have and change the > PNP > > code to match. (Let it create dynamic devices but pass more information > in > > the info structure so that the enables get set, etc.) The hierarchy buys > us > > nothing if we just make lots of little files and types. > > I think this makes the most sense. I'll implement this one and send a patch. I don't like it being labeled dynamic, but I will live (or else I'll change it.) Thanks, Myles
-- coreboot mailing list: [email protected] http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
