On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 5:27 PM, ron minnich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 2:02 PM, Stefan Reinauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > In fact the area is not completely clean due to the binutils workaround.
> We
> > had "nicer" code there, and it broke on Ron's binutils, so we went to the
> > current version. It works, so don't waste time fixing it.
>
> In fact, if anything, can we please fix the cn700?


Working on it!

Current status: a GPIO line isn't getting disabled for some reason (even
though it's disabled several times), and the damn chipset reboots when the
timer it controls expires. Once the board reboots, something isn't working
correctly, presumably CAR, and the LAR can't be read from. I'm working from
revision 1010, but I think it's the same status in current svn. I'll be
spending more time with it this weekend, from the sound of the weather
report I won't be able to do much else anyways :p

-Corey



>
>
> these cosmetic patches are not really helping anything.
>
> ron
>
> --
> coreboot mailing list: [email protected]
> http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot
>
--
coreboot mailing list: [email protected]
http://www.coreboot.org/mailman/listinfo/coreboot

Reply via email to